This deviation has been labeled as containing themes not suitable for all deviants.
Log in to view

Deviation Actions

psyopjunkie's avatar

Meanwhile on shore

By
Published:
336 Views

Description

Utoya shooting and Oslo bombing smacks of a psy-op. Are we really expected to believe that the helicopter crew was on holiday despite a 'high level terror alert' and the best they could do is improvise with a leaky boat?

[link]

[link]

If that were the only oddity maybe you could chalk it up to incompetence. But consider some of the many other oddities:


2. It seems all those in charge of the camp bar one weren't on the island, but in the hotel.

And the one on the island was the first person OFF it the instant the shooting started, he 'luckily' having a motorboat handy.

3. The moment Breivik saw the security services on the way in, he laid the weapon down, hands on head, and surrendered.


[link]

Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.

[link]

5. It has again come up there was another killer, who might have arrived in a boat on the other side of the island, 'a man with dark long hair in civilian clothes'.

~~

"The witnesses described the second man as a 180-centimeter tall, dark-haired man with Nordic appearance with 'a pistol in his right hand and a rifle on his back.'"

[link]

[link]

In his 1500-page manifesto, the Norwegian Right wing extremist disclosed that he planned to put a composition called Lux Aeterna on repeat on his iPod and listen to it at the maximum volume while murdering the young people at a summer camp.

But the witnesses said headset, not earphones. So this is ust another pathetic attempt to explain away the evidence.

[link]

In Oslo, a powerful bomb went off in or near the building which houses the office of the Prime Minister. Exactly as we would expect, special anti-terror police had been drilling setting off bombs in a nearby part of the Norwegian capital little more than 48 hours earlier.

[link]

Veterans Today has received reports from sources in Oslo indicating that the bomb, now believed to be equal to more than 10 tons of TNT, was not a car bomb. Reports indicate that “sewer workers” had been accessing the site during the days prior to the explosion, which is now estimated, were conventional explosives to have been used, to have required enough “fertilizer slurry” explosive to have filled a rail car.

The explosion is estimated to resemble that of the Marine Barracks in Beirut in 1983, killing over 200 or the Oklahoma City bombing. There is considerable controversy in both of these attacks as to the explosives described and the results which far exceed the capabilities of the materials claim to have been used, in both cases by a degree of magnitude.

20 tons of fertilizer and fuel oil are unlikely to have fit into the boot of a typical European rental car, even with a “midsize upgrade.”

Car bombs use military grade explosives, not fertilizer bombs. Real car bomb video below. Explosion isn’t 1% of the Oslo blast:

[link]

1500 Page Manifesto “Cut and Paste” Phony

The 32 year-old appears to have quoted verbatim large sections from the preaching of Theodore Kaczynski in his 1500 page online rant.

Breivik had “copied and pasted” almost a dozen key passages from the 69 year-old’s 35,000 manifesto, only changing particular words such as “leftist” with “cultural Marxist”.



Etc. etc.

Norwegians really need to demand some kind of an inquest into the events in addition to the court case against the alleged shooter. They should look into Norwegian laws relating to releasing official information (such as who ordered the helicopter crew to go on holiday).

Even if you think questioning official stories is somehow sick (???) there is still an incentive to an inquiry. If matter appear covered up, the event will keep getting dragged up by conspiracy theorists. Such as this court case relating to the 7/7 bombings, where a jury indirectly concluded it was a psyop:


Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth plotting of in cooperation 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that in cooperation these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in detail, mistaken flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a cause for invasion of innocuous countries in the middle east in peacefulness to control their natural assets.

This was indeed the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of mistaken flag terror made against any state previous to an run of the mill collection of the citizens of that state.

It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is positioned previous to such run of the mill citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the mediate allowable a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12.

Hill was found not guilty, not because his actions were painstaking officially authorized but rather because his authentication made a powerful case against the British government. The jury was pressed to convict hill but refused. The 10 members who sided with Hill and refused the instructions of the Crown did so, out of utter shock at the powerful case Hill made demonstrating that, not only 7/7 was an “inside job” but 9/11 as well. Hill took on in cooperation attacks and 10 of 12 jury members sided with what has been often called “conspiracy theory.”

[link]


Or Port Arthur, where a video was released (containing stolen police evidence) to highlight the accuracy of the shooter (number of headshots):

[link]
Image size
530x364px 69.89 KB
Mature
© 2011 - 2024 psyopjunkie
Comments9
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In